Buddhist Wisdom Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 770377258
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Sunnyvale, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4087471769
- Rating
- 49
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Buddhism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $196,223
- Expenses
- $30,283
- Assets
- $2,016,168
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- HO TZU YEN (CEO/PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- HO TZU YEN (CEO/PRESIDENT): $272,773 total reported compensation
- YUNG TSAI YEN (SECRETARY): $272,773 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To worship and to spread the buddhist religion and philosophy to the public and to provide religious and cultural services.
What it reported doing in 2024
There were regular chenrezig, meditation, sojong vows, and green tara practices at the center.100% of the occupancy expenses, 14,812, were allocated to this program.grants were meal allowances for monks at the center.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 76% for direct work, and 24% for grants.
The verdict
MIXED - Program spending has grown recently and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 48
- Accountability: 18
- Sustainability: 85
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57.6%; rating input score 58
- Program expense ratio: 65.3%; rating input score 65
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 80%; rating input score 80; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 84.6%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 66.58; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17.9% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 57.6% of revenue deployed · 65.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $20K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $273K · 4 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 17 of 19 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grants require schedule f did not reconcile in the filed values.