Buckskin Council Boy Scouts of America
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 550357013
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Charleston, WV, USA
- Phone
- 3043403663
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,556,437
- Expenses
- $1,957,729
- Assets
- $8,339,355
- Liabilities
- $348,174
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
52 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHNNY MCGHEE (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT (VP))
- DAVID LUNSFORD (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JEFFREY L PURDY (SCOUT EXECUTIVE): $161,399 total reported compensation
- LARRY WUNDERLY (ASSISTANT SCOUT EXECUTIVE): $104,533 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The corporation shall promote, within the territory covered by the charter from time to time granted it by the boy scouts of america, the scouting program of promoting the ability of boys and young men and women to do things for themselves and others, training them in scoutcraft, and teaching them patriotism, courage, self-reliance, and kindred virtues, using the methods which are now common use by the boy scouts of america.
What it reported doing in 2025
The buckskin council boy scouts of america ("the council") is a West Virginia non-profit corporation which is a separate legal entity from the boy scouts of america (bsa). The council operates under the terms of a charter issued by the bsa with an annual charter fee paid by the council to the bsa. The council owns and controls its corporate assets and liabilities entirely separately from the bsa. The council serves Virginia, West Virginia, Ohio, and Kentucky from its service center in charleston, wv. The council has four camping facilities. The council is a not-for-profit organization devoted to promoting within the territory covered by the charter from time to time granted it by the boy scouts of america and in accordance with the congressional charter, bylaws, and rules and regulations of the boy scouts of america, the scouting program of promoting the ability of boys, girls, young men and women to do things for themselves and others, training them in scoutcraft, and teaching them patriotism, courage, self-reliance, and kindred virtues, using the methods which are now in common use by the boy scouts of america. The council delivered the scouting program to 2,601 youth members in 2025.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 99
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.8%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 72.7%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.85 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 98%; rating input score 98; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -25.8%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.26; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.6%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.8% of revenue deployed · 72.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 50 of 51 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $161K · 52 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.