Bucks County World Language Academy

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
462110409
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Furlong, PA, USA
Phone
2672251587
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Specialized Education Institutions

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$38,862
Expenses
$63,844
Assets
$17,626
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SUE KLIMPL (PRESIDENT)
  • MELISSA HARRISON (VICE PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY)

People named in this filing

  • DR BRIAN CAUGHIE (DIRECTOR)
  • DR JEANANN KAHLEY (DIRECTOR)
  • AIDA RIVERA GONZALEZ (PROGRAM DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Bucks county world language academy is a student-centered, before and after-school offering that promotes the development of foreign language fluency.

What it reported doing in 2020

The bucks county world language academy (bcwla) is a student-centered, before and after-school offering that promotes the development of foreign language fluency. Children participate in activities, which build their vocabulary, speech patterns and communication abilities. As they explore a second language, children cultivate awareness, curiosity, and appreciation for world cultures, which in turn enhances learning in all disciplines. As a result of their participation in the bcwla, learners gain enrichment opportunities well beyond that of a traditional foreign language program.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -64.3%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.28; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 16.8%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.8% per year; rating input score 0; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2013 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.