Bucks Bounty Harvest Ministries

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
393129551
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Bensalem, PA, USA
Phone
2153012396
Rating
63
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Food Banks, Pantries

Reported finances

Revenue
$81,172
Expenses
$18,771
Assets
$76,089
Liabilities
$13,688

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • THOMAS R JORDAN (Vice President)
  • JENNIFER J ROOT (President)

People named in this filing

  • THOMAS R JORDAN (Vice President)
  • JOANN J JORDAN (Treasurer/Sec)
  • JENNIFER J ROOT (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization's mission as a food pantry is to solicit, collect and distribute food to low income families and disadvantaged individuals within the bucks county area of Pennsylvania as well as flea market sales of donated goods to further their mission.

What it reported doing in 2025

Bucks bounty harvest ministries operated a food pantry open two days per week serving low income families and disadvantaged individuals in bucks county, Pennsylvania. During the tax year, the pantry served approximately 400-450 family per weekand approximately 35,800 individuals over the five month operating period august through december.since inception, the organization has disributed and estimated 500,000 pounds of food for those in need in the bucks county community.vehicle used 90 % for pantry operations including food pickup and delivery. Program service expenses:$16,742

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 65% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 52
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 77
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 23.1%; rating input score 23
  • Program expense ratio: 99.8%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 76.9%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.05; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 23.1% of revenue deployed · 99.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $19K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 23/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.