Bsa Parents Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 834710333
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Arlington, VA, USA
- Phone
- 2054274556
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $840,293
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DON MCCHESNEY (PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD)
People named in this filing
- MONIQUE YEAGER (BOARD MEMBER)
- DON MCCHESNEY (PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD)
- LEIGH ANNE LEBLANC (BOARD SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of bsa parents is to recruit, inform and amplify voices of those who believe: that the boy scouts of america is a vital organization that plays an indispensable role in the formation of character and values in america's youth. That the boy scouts of america is invaluable to our communities. That the boy scouts of america is a welcoming and inclusive organization that should live on and thrive for generations to come. That the boy scouts of america has a social and moral responsibility to continue to protect youth and it needs to continue to live out this duty every day. Bsa parents is a 501c(4) not-for-profit that was started by parents of scouts and friends of the bsa. We started this organization to help tell the stories of scouts and the important role scouting plays in our communities and in our country.
What it reported doing in 2020
Interviewed bsa parents members in atlanta, st. Louis and dallas for production videos. Participated in boy scouts of america conferences in denver (national annual conference) and dallas (top hands conference).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 95.8%; rating input score 96
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $805K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.