Bryant Gladney Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 921662922
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Prosper, TX, USA
- Phone
- 5736733810
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $72,900
- Expenses
- $58,669
- Assets
- $103,202
- Liabilities
- $19,040
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHAUN GLADNEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- JAMIE GLADNEY (PRESIDENT, BOARD MEMBER)
People named in this filing
- SHAUN GLADNEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- JULIA GLADNEY (OUTREACH DIRECTOR)
- JAMIE GLADNEY (PRESIDENT, BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Bryant Gladney Foundation inspires future generations of EMS Providers to be exceptional caregivers by providing education and scholarship opportunities.
What it reported doing in 2025
Education program - the foundation provides educational opportunities for emergency medical service providers throughout the united states. In 2025 we conducted 32 different training courses to a total of 56 students and were able to award 463 continuing education hours to ems providers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 51% for direct work, and 49% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 46
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 43.4%; rating input score 43
- Program expense ratio: 52.2%; rating input score 52
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 19.5%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.76; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 54.2% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 44.1% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 39.7% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 43.4% of revenue deployed · 52.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $31K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 43/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.