Bryans House Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
752801818
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Dallas, TX, USA
Phone
2145593946
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$113,574
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SARAH LAMB (Vice President)
  • LEE PRATER-FROM 112024 (INTERIM CEO)

People named in this filing

  • KEITH MANKIN (BOARD CHAIR)
  • SARAH LAMB (Vice President)
  • ALLISON SHELTON (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization shall in all events be operated exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of and to carry out the purposes of Open Arms, Inc. or such other organizations exempt under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code that are organized specifically for the benefit or support of Open Arms, Inc.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Corporation shall include, but not be limited to: (I) to raise, invest and administer endowment funds to sustain the operating and capital requirements of Open Arms, Inc., a Texas non-profit organization currently operating under the name of Open Arms, Inc.; (ii) to make grants, loans or other distributions to or for the benefit of Open Arms, Inc. and such other organizations that qualify as exempt organizations under Section 50l(c)(3) of the Code and that support or otherwise benefit Open Arms, Inc.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 28.6% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -14.5% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -18.8% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $114K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 20 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.