Brush Up Nebraska Paint-a-thon Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
470731074
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Omaha, NE, USA
Phone
4029659201
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Home Improvement and Repairs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$38,906
Expenses
$28,587
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TOM PETTIGREW (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • SHEILA PETTIGREW (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • KELLY SOUDER (PRESIDENT)
  • DENNIS ROSS (VICE PRESIDENT/TREASURER)

People named in this filing

  • TOM PETTIGREW (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • SHEILA PETTIGREW (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • KELLY SOUDER (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Painting homes for the low-income, elderly and disabled

What it reported doing in 2019

Volunteers donate approximately 14,400 hours of time painting the exterior of 60 homes of low-income, elderly and disabled persons in omaha, ne, lincoln, ne and council bluffs, ia. Pride of ownership as well as number of homes saved by the service are unmeasurable.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 54.5%; rating input score 55
  • Program expense ratio: 74.2%; rating input score 74

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 26.5%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 70.8%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -7.9% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 54.5% of revenue deployed · 74.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $21K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2010 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.