Browning the Green Space Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 853806985
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Boston, MA, USA
- Phone
- 6173568180
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,194,719
- Expenses
- $914,323
- Assets
- $704,673
- Liabilities
- $81,656
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KERRY BOWIE (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ALISHA HARRINGTON (DEPUTY DIREC): $155,332 total reported compensation
- KERRY BOWIE (PRESIDENT): $105,577 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We seek to facilitate a just energy transition by putting black and brown communities first, and enabling systems change at the intersection of social, environmental, and economic justice. We are powering a just energy transition in the northeast by creating jobs, building wealth, and reducing energy burden in black and brown communities. By removing barriers and expanding access, we seek to close the racial wealth gap while combating climate change.
What it reported doing in 2024
Workforce development: our workforce development initiatives pave pathways to employment in clean energy for students of color through scholarships, curriculum development, and workforce development, as well as help clean energy employers embrace, incorporate, and achieve dei goals in their recruitment, hiring, and retention activities. Our programing in this area includes: i.prospects: browning the green space, in partnership with xodus group, designed and launched a multifaceted workforce program that includes targeted community engagement campaigns to deliver an overview of the offshore wind industry for high school and community college students in environmental justice communities, and demonstration of pathways to industry employment through internships and pre-apprenticeships. Through the program, we have reached 400+ high school students through events with employers and post-secondary institutions to expose students to career opportunities in clean energy. Ii. Student internship program success (sips) initiative: bgs has served as a training provider for the Massachusetts clean energy center's sips initiative (formerly the targeted internship program) for the past 5 years. This program started as a pilot project in 2021 to address the lack of diversity within masscec's existing summer internship program. Bgs participated as a training provider in that pilot program and continued each subsequent summer ultimately taking over as the lead provide for the 2024 and 2025 sessions, bgs's role as a training provider is to recruit and match first generation college students, pell grant recipients and residents of environmental justice neighborhoods with clean energy employers for summer internship opportunities. Beyond screening and matching students with internships, bgs provides employer orientation and continued support for students, including professional skill-building workshops, clean energy career exposure opportunities, a mentoring program with professionals in the field, and community building within the cohort. Over the first 5 years of the program, bgs recruited, placed, and supported over 150 interns and over 300 employers with training around building more inclusive and supportive internship environments. Iii.renewable energy technology associate's degree outreach and recruitment: in partnership with benjamin franklin cummings institute of technology, bgs provided outreach, recruitment, and financial support to students for a new renewable energy associates degree program at bfit. The goal of this partnership was to increase awareness about the new associate's degree program by exposing students to clean energy topics and high-paying career opportunities in this sector. Bgs and bfit held virtual info sessions about the program, two renewable energy career days for students of dearborn stem academy, academy of the pacific rim, mary lyons pilot high school, youthbuild boston, boston day and evening academy, excel academy charter high school, phoenix charter academy (chelsea), citylab high school (revere) and john d. O'bryant high school of math and science, a bga senior intern project around student video creation, and a power your future career day attended by students of madison park vocational/technical high school, dearborn stem, somerville high school, charlestown high school, and boston green academy at greentown labs. In total, this program reached 130 students. Rhode Island clean energy internship program: bgs is working as the education and opportunity partner for the Rhode Island office of energy resources (oer) in support of their clean energy internship program for the past 2 years. Bgs works to recruit students of color for internships with ri-based clean energy companies and environmental nonprofits. In addition to their internship, all students participating in the program receive career and professional development workshops, mentoring, and connections with peers at other companies throughout the summ
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 78
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 59.4%; rating input score 59
- Program expense ratio: 77.6%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $58.28 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 23.5%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.77; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 28.5%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 42.8% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 47.8% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 47.2% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 59.4% of revenue deployed · 77.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $710K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $155K · 10 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.