Broward House Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
592913416
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
Phone
9545224749
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Group Homes

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,930,835
Expenses
$11,126,606
Assets
$30,560,422
Liabilities
$3,552,210

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • NICOLE BURRELL (CEO)
  • MICHAEL WEINSTEIN (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • NICOLE BURRELL (CEO): $194,291 total reported compensation
  • KAREN WHYTE (COO): $141,883 total reported compensation
  • JAMES LAI (CFO): $122,999 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mission the mission of broward house is to improve the quality of life for individuals impacted with chronic health challenges, including HIV, by providing pathways to wellness. Vision providing hope and healing to our communities.

What it reported doing in 2025

Behavioral health prevention and intervention broward county fort lauderdale currently ranks number two in the nation, logging the 2nd highest number of new AIDS cases per captial in the united states . Florida ranks 3rd in the nation in the number of persons living with AIDS. We are working to change these facts through education, awareness, creative intervention and testing. Substance abuse and treatment an intensive day treatment program is provided to HIV adults who have had previous treatment expereience or relapse episodes. Clients live in teh residential campus of broward house during treatment. A day treatment program available to HIV individuals who have stable living arrangements and support in the community. Individuals with co-occurring mental health needs are

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 87% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 84% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 66
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 83.6%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 81.5%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $42.86 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.8%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.75; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.1%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 83.6% of revenue deployed · 81.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $9.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $194K · 9 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
  • Filing history: 17 filing years from 2009 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.