Broward Community Powerhouse Ministries Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
472316722
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
Phone
9546653255
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Reported finances

Expenses
$150
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$150

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • REV SHERRYANN WILTSHIRE (PRESIDENT)
  • MRS BEVERLY GORDON (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • REV SHERRYANN WILTSHIRE (PRESIDENT)
  • MS DIERLINE ALEXIS (SECRETARY)
  • MRS ALDITH K JEFFERSON (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

B.c.p.m inc is a non-profit corporation that operates exclusively for educational[: comma:] religious and charitable purposes including for in-kind purposes[: comma:] the making of distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt organization within the meaning of section 501 ( c) ( 3) of the internal revenue code or the corresponding sections of any future federal tax code which governs n0n-profit corporations. Contributions received will be utilized to eliminate poverty and social exclusion by improving social[: comma:] educational[: comma:] spiritual and economic infrastructure[: comma:] promoting self sufficiency and supporting efforts to diminish social inequalities that are prevalent in communities.

What it reported doing in 2017

Bcpm inc in its short existence has had some social outreaches to diverse communities though uncompensated in developing social demeanors and self worth development via informal gatherings.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 3 of 3 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.