Brother Jeff's Cultural Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 320034993
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Denver, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3032970823
- Rating
- 93
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- AIDS
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $115,912
- Expenses
- $210,152
- Assets
- $223,522
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
People named in this filing
- ALLEN SMITH (CHAIR)
- AMAIL ALAM (TREASURER)
- RALPH MILLS (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Dedicated to providing human services through elimination of illiteracy and health disparities such as HIV/AIDS among african americans of all ages and backgrounds through leadership, community involvement, and collaboration.
What it reported doing in 2024
During the year, brother jeff's cultural center provided for support groups for individuals living with HIV and AIDS; provided workshops for schools, organizations and health professionals; media appearances; distributed cases of HIV prevention pamphlets and materials; and provided free HIV testing and referrals throughout the year. Distributed 17,000 meals and food boxes during the year for people in need. Brother jeff's cultural center connected 3,000 to covid education, immunization, or booster shots. The organization distributed 10,000 new christmas toys to families during the holiday season.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 96.2%; rating input score 96
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -81.3%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.06; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.1%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.8% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.5% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 96.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $202K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.