Broomfield Islamic Community Center of Colorado
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 334636356
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Broomfield, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3039011069
- Rating
- 53
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Islam
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,088,454
- Expenses
- $32,790
- Assets
- $1,946,103
- Liabilities
- $1,893,380
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MOHAMMAD A LATIF (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- AFSHEEN AHMAD (COMMUNICATIONS COORDINATOR)
- MD SAIDUR RAHMAN (MEMBER)
- MOHAMMAD A LATIF (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Activities, classes, and support systems for families and future leaders of the community. Serving Broomfield and surrounding commities of Westminster, Louisville, Lafayett, and Erie.
What it reported doing in 2025
Organization raised funds to purchase and begin renovations on a property to use for daily prayers, education, and community events.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 35
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 38
- Sustainability: 85
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 3%; rating input score 3
- Program expense ratio: 99.9%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 44.4%; rating input score 44; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 97%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 59.35; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.97; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 3% of revenue deployed · 99.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 9 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $33K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 44/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.