Brookwood Football Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 582077709
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Lilburn, GA, USA
- Phone
- 4042919663
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $98,017
- Expenses
- $94,649
- Assets
- $2,322
- Liabilities
- $14,509
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL SHAFFER (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JANESSA MCNEELY (TREASURER)
- VEROUSKA WHIGHAM (SECRETARY)
- MICHAEL SHAFFER (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the brookwood football association (bfa) is to provide a football and cheerleading program with a major emphasis upon fun and enjoyment for all youth interested in playing and developing their athletic skills in football and cheerleading.the overriding goals are to provide boys and girls with an opportunity to develop good sportmanship and physical fitness, and to teach skills and techniques of the game of football and cheerleading. The bfa operates under the authority of the gwinnett county, Georgia parks and recreation department and is administered by a 30 member board of directors. -brookwood football association website
What it reported doing in 2020
The organization provides recreational football and cheerleading programs for the youth in gwinnett county, Georgia.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 90.1%; rating input score 90
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.4%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 6.25; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -11.1% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -7% per year; rating input score 0; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -21.5% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87% of revenue deployed · 90.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $85K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2015 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.