Brookside Elementary School Pto

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237171697
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Westwood, NJ, USA
Phone
2016645560
Rating
59
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$79,770
Expenses
$69,908
Assets
$48,100
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DANIELLE SKIBA (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • ERIN PODSADA (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • BRYANNA O'HARE (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DANIELLE SKIBA (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • ERIN PODSADA (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • BRYANNA O'HARE (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote the welfare of brookside elementary schooland it's students by education & cultural experiences.it assists with the costs of classroom supplies & enhancingcommunications. The pto promotes the welfare of studentsin the home, school & community. It supplements the educationexperiences of approximatley 391 students and 21 classroomsteachers of grades kindergarten through 5th grade.

What it reported doing in 2024

School purchases-for the benefit of thestudents-the organization uses netrevenue to acquire items or apply towardschool improvements which will benefit thestudents quality of education

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 40
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 56
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 37.6%; rating input score 38
  • Program expense ratio: 42.9%; rating input score 43

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12.4%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.69; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -6.1% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 37.6% of revenue deployed · 42.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $30K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 43/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.