Brooks Jennings Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 833407336
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Glen Mills, PA, USA
- Phone
- 2158061714
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Parent Agencies
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $27,387
- Expenses
- $17,664
- Assets
- $77,732
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JILL JENNINGS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ALAN OLIVER (TREASURER)
- KRISTEN MEMBRINO (SECRETARY)
- JILL JENNINGS (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Brooks jennings foundation, inc.s mission is to support the physical and emotional well-being of widowed mothers with children after the loss of their father. We will provide peer support groups, food/mortgage assistance, and educational seminars on how to handle common issues faced by the death of a loved one. Our vision is that each widow or child can begin to heal and learn to live a meaningful life without their loved one. Initially our programs will support widowed families from Delaware and chester counties, Pennsylvania, though our vision is to expand to other regions as funding for the foundation grows.
What it reported doing in 2024
A yearly fundraiser - brooks jennings memorial classic golf outing, held at radley run country club, 1100 country club road, west chester, pa 19382, september each year.funds provide financial support for families with young children who have suffered the death/loss of a mother or father. We contributed 16,618.00 to widows with young families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.7%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 94.1%; rating input score 94
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 35.5%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.4; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.3% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 60.7% of revenue deployed · 94.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $17K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.