Brooklyn Sportsmans Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 382509887
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2010
- Location
- Brooklyn, MI, USA
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $168,238
- Expenses
- $199,051
- Assets
- $381,434
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN CALHOUN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOHN CALHOUN (PRESIDENT)
- MICK HOLMES (1ST VICE PRE)
- RAY GARROW (2ND VICE PRE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The members of the brooklyn sportsmans club, believe in the principles of sportsmanship, preservation of land, fish, fowl, game, and all forms of conservation, and know that when these principles are followed the community benefits as a whole, particularly the sportsman, farmer and the lover of nature, and therefore, we have joined together in association for the purpose of fostering these principles.
What it reported doing in 2024
The members of the brooklyn sportsmans club, believe in the principles of sportsmanship, conservation of land, fish, fowl, game, community education involvement conservation, and know that when these principles are followed the community benefits as a whole; therefore, we have joined together in association for the purpose of fostering these principles.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 78% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 94.5%; rating input score 95
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -18.3%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.92; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 94.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $188K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.