Brooklyn & Long Island Chapter of the Acs
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 111244817
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Mineola, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5167413887
- Rating
- 57
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $112,691
- Expenses
- $144,155
- Assets
- $14,622
- Liabilities
- $74,035
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHAHRIYOUR ANDAZ MD FACS (PRESIDENT)
- BRIAN KEITH MCNEIL MD FACS (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- TERESA A BARZYZ (CHAPTER ADMINISTRATOR): $68,652 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Refer to schedule o.
What it reported doing in 2025
Friedman annual award dinner/essay contest - residents submit papers in research and clinical categories for review in the competition, providing the latest pertinent information to the surgical community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 30
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 6
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 37.4%; rating input score 37
- Program expense ratio: 29.3%; rating input score 29
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -27.9%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.1; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 5.06; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 47.6%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 37.4% of revenue deployed · 29.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 35 of 35 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $42K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $69K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 37/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 29/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.