Brooklyn Botanic Garden
Legal name: Brooklyn Botanic Garden Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 112417338
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Brooklyn, NY, USA
- Phone
- 718-623-7200
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Botanical Gardens, Arboreta and Botanical Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $36,200,661
- Expenses
- $29,425,221
- Assets
- $158,773,654
- Liabilities
- $14,621,967
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
45 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ADRIAN BENEPE (PRESIDENT)
- ROWAN BLAIK (VICE PRESIDENT OF HORTICUL)
Highest reported compensation
- ADRIAN BENEPE (PRESIDENT): $393,327 total reported compensation
- KATHRYN GLASS (CHIEF OF MARKETING AND VIS): $266,810 total reported compensation
- DOROTA RASHID (CFO, VP OF FINANCE): $265,753 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Brooklyn Botanic Garden connects people to the wonder and power of plants.
What it reported doing in 2024
Security, program enhancement, membership, admissions, and publications.security: security ensures that our garden and its living collections are protected and that our visitors' environment is safe.program enhancements: combining recreation with horticultural and ecological interpretation and education, the garden produces a variety of seasonal public programs that highlight the collections and the season and celebrate the cultural diversity of brooklyn. In the spring, the garden honors the japanese tradition of hanami: celebrating the cherry blossom season with dance, music, and performance. The garden celebrates summer and fall with programmed evenings, highlighting local artists and brooklyn culture. In addition, the garden enhances the experience of itsvisitors and patrons with various exhibitions and a comprehensive visitor services program.membership: membership enhances the garden visitor experience by providing year-round access to the garden, specialty after-hours garden events, brooklyn botanic garden corporation 11-2417338as well as additional educational materials. The membership program avails visitors of various garden and community discounts.admissions: the garden is committed to making its exhibitions, programs, and collections accessible to all who visit. To ensure accessibility, the garden maintains a community ticket program, where a portion of each days' tickets are set aside for those who need them. In addition to thecommunity ticket program, the garden participates in various complimentary or reduced priced admission programs.publications: the digital and print media department creates original, mission-driven media that informs the public about plants, ecology, and horticulture. Products include garden guides to a better planet, editorial services for all of the garden's interpretation and printed material, as well ascollection and management of photos documenting the garden's collections. The department also manages the garden's website, bbg.org, that offers gardening articles, a nature blog, historic images of the collections, and rich research resources.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 77
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.2%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 82.4%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $14.48 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.7%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.4; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.8%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 68.2% of revenue deployed · 82.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 36 of 36 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $24.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $393K · 45 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $452K reported
- Consistency: 38 of 38 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 49/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 44/100.