The Bronxville Women's Club, Inc.

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
131699505
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2024
Official website data refreshed
Aug 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Bronxville, NY, US
Phone
914-337-3252
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Women's Service Clubs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$149,849
Expenses
$191,045
Assets
$400,634
Liabilities
$581,654

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARY WESTMORELAND (President)
  • BARBARA STEVENSON (Vice President)
  • OXANA MIKHAILOFF (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • ROSEMARIE SPAMER-ZELTNER (Director)
  • MARY WESTMORELAND (President)
  • ELIZABETH MULLER (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Bronxville Women's Club is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization whose membership is open to all women and men interested in educational, cultural, civic, health, and art programs. Its philanthropy programs raise funds distributed to local charities and non-profit organizations as a service to the community.

What it reported doing in 2024

To foster cultural and education programs with music, lectures, workshops, discussions, concerts, trips and other activities to benefit community needs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 3
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 2.7%; rating input score 3
  • Program expense ratio: 2.1%; rating input score 2

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -27.5%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.1; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.45; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -11.3% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 9 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 4 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 2.7% of revenue deployed · 2.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $4K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.