Bronxville Historical Conservancy Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 133944453
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Bronxville, NY, USA
- Phone
- 9143376500
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Historical Societies, Related Historical Activities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $485,924
- Expenses
- $186,032
- Assets
- $4,775,059
- Liabilities
- $11,744
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
35 people listed
People named in this filing
- William Zambelli (Executive Board)
- Erin Saluti (Executive Board)
- Tina Adams (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Bronxville Historical Conservancy was established to further the understanding and appreciation of the history and current life in the Village of Bronxville, New York.
What it reported doing in 2025
Presentation of programs, lectures and special events, including Brendan Gill lecture series on presidential history, childrens programs and World War I historical events in Bronxville
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 41
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 86
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 28.6%; rating input score 29
- Program expense ratio: 74.4%; rating input score 74
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 68.6%; rating input score 69; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 61.7%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 25.67; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 28.6% of revenue deployed · 74.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 24 of 35 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $138K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 35 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 29/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.