Bronson Vicksburg Hospital
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 382610349
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2010
- Forms available
- Form 990 2010
- Location
- Kalamazoo, MI, USA
- Phone
- 2693416000
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,657,423
- Expenses
- $6,659,593
- Assets
- $1,929,508
- Liabilities
- $637,390
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
27 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide excellent healthcare services
What it reported doing in 2010
In 2010 in furtherance of its mission, bvh incurred $685,866 in bad debt to provide care to its patients.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 85
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.29; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.33; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.1%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 12 of 16 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $6.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.1M · 27 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay and related organizations
- Related organizations: 15 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 53/100.