Broken Bow Booster Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 873664187
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Broken Bow, NE, USA
- Phone
- 3086437116
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $46,436
- Expenses
- $46,154
- Assets
- $125,542
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRENT KIRKPATRICK (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- BRENT KIRKPATRICK (PRESIDENT)
- MICHAELA SCHWEITZER (VICE-PRESIDE)
- TAMMY CHAPIN (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promoting athletic programs, increasing community interest, recognizing the endeavors and achievements of teams and individual athletes, and assisting the athletic department, coaches, and administrative staff of the broken bow public schools district no. 25, broken bow, Nebraska.
What it reported doing in 2024
12-sport athlete scholarship: the booster club provides college scholarships to 12-sport athletes graduating from broken bow public schools district no. 25, broken bow, Nebraska. A 12-sport athlete is a student who participated in a sport during all three seasons (fall, winter, and spring) of each of their four years of high school. Each scholarship is 500. All students who are a 12- sport athlete qualify for the scholarship. The scholarship is paid to the student after they provide the board with a copy of their class schedule for their second semester of college. There is no limit on the number of scholarships awarded each year; however, there are usually only ten or less students that qualify each year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 99% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 97.3%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 97.7%; rating input score 98
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.6%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.72; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -19.6% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -11% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 97.3% of revenue deployed · 97.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $45K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.