Broc Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
461941501
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Phone
2254087936
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Adult, Continuing Education

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,272,239
Expenses
$1,260,531
Assets
$355,888
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JARED BRAUD (DIRECTOR)
  • NICK HATZIS (DIRECTOR)
  • TIMOTHY BOWLIN (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support local schools and athletic programs by facilitating and providing direct services throughout the community in the areas of athletic training outreach & support, injury education, prevention & safety, equipment & supplies for injury treatment, recovery & rehabilitation, concussion management and clinical research in injury management.

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2024, the broc foundation ("foundation") remained focused on its mission to provide health care education, injury prevention, and medical treatment to the regional community.the foundation's athletic training outreach program continued to provide nationally certified, state-licensed athletic trainers to multiple high schools and youth sports organizations, further strengthening our presence in local school systems. Notably, 100% of the high schools served by the foundation either maintained or reestablished their recognition as "safe sports schools" by the national athletic trainers association. Our athletic trainers played a key role in covering regional and high school athletic events, as well as club sporting activities across several parishes. It is also worth noting that nine of the twelve high schools served qualify for the "title 1" education program.the foundation provided additional support through its free "friday night football clinic," where 42 high school student-athletes were evaluated under physician oversight. Additionally, we held our 4th annual "game day prep physical day," providing 1,041 free athletic physicals to student-athletes from across the region with the help of over 135 volunteers. Throughout "physical season," the foundation provided more than 3,500 free physicals to student-athletes at their home schools.the foundation maintained daily orthopedic assessments and rehabilitation services on local campuses, covering approximately 20,000 student-athletes. This included full-time care at both southern university and baton rouge community college, as well as expanded coverage for approximately 2,000 student-athletes within the east baton rouge parish school district.thanks to the support of our community partners, the foundation was able to provide these services at little to no cost to participating schools and youth organizations. In 2024, we provided over $10,000 in free mri scans and physician appointments for underinsured individuals. Full-time athletic trainers on school campuses enabled better patient care, educational support, and relief for working parents facing challenges with funding or transportation.our local physical therapy clinics and hospitals continued to play a vital role in supporting this program by providing exceptional access to care, made possible through the foundation's presence on local community campuses.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 97
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 98.2%; rating input score 98
  • Program expense ratio: 99.1%; rating input score 99
  • Fundraising efficiency: $116.46 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.9%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.28; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 28.6% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 24.6% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.3% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 98.2% of revenue deployed · 99.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.