Broadlands Csl Swim Team Organization

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464103508
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Ashburn, VA, USA
Phone
7035813670
Rating
34
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Swimming & Other Water Recreation

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,772
Expenses
$3,938
Assets
$5,755

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Michelle Quadt (President)

People named in this filing

  • Michelle Quadt (President)
  • Julie Gaddi (Secretary)
  • Tracie Buckley (Team Representative)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the Organization is to serve as a collaborative enterprise of parents & guardians dedicated to assisting, promoting, guiding & facilitating the organization, management & operation of the Broadlands CSL Swim Team,

What it reported doing in 2020

The Broadland CLS Piranhas are a developmentally competitive program designed to teach proper swim techniques, principlesof good sportsmanship, & team spirit. Our main goal is to provide each swimmer a fun and successful summer swim teamexperience while fostering a love for the sport of swimming. We teach each swimmer skills that promote life-long fitness.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -122.2%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.46; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -19.7% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -19% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2014 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.