Broad Run Baptist Cemetery Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 550454674
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Jane Lew, WV, USA
- Phone
- 3045177077
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Cemeteries
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $134,789
- Expenses
- $53,639
- Assets
- $1,172,266
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Bryan D Smith (Trustee): $19,940 total reported compensation
- Evan S Bennett (Trustee): $6,240 total reported compensation
- Donna M Smith (Secretery): $5,400 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Operate a Cemetery
What it reported doing in 2025
Operate and maintain cemetery by selling lots maintaining the cemetery site by mowing the cemetery and maintaining headstones.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 73% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 52.2%; rating input score 52
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 60.2%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 21.85; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 58.9%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16.1% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.9% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 52.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $54K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $20K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.