Broad Creek Child Development Associatio

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521970240
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Fort Washington, MD, USA
Phone
3012484290
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Kindergarten, Preschool, Nursery School, Early Admissions

Reported finances

Revenue
$-2,275
Expenses
$48,364
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Daena Padilla (President)
  • Ruiz Castillo (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Daena Padilla (President)
  • Ruiz Castillo (Vice President)
  • Debbie Taylor (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Broad Creek provides education for young children as a preschool partial day setting. Through a creative learning environment with small class sizes, Broad Creek strives to prepare children for kindergarten. The program is nondenominational and open to the all in the community.

What it reported doing in 2020

Broad Creek provided education for young children as a preschool partial day setting. Through a creative learning environment with small class sizes, Broad Creek strives to prepare children for kindergarten. The program is nondenominational and open to all in the community. Unfortunately BCCDA was not able to operate during the fiscal year, and shut down permanently as of 6/30/2021.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 87% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 9
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 2
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 23.3%; rating input score 23

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2,225.9%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 31.8%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -12.6% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -16.3% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -17.4% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 23.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $11K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2014 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 23/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.