Briya Public Charter School

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
204497716
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2022327777
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Adult, Continuing Education

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$18,201,301
Expenses
$16,991,401
Assets
$31,307,141
Liabilities
$3,781,901

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • CHRISTINE R MCKAY (EXECUTIVE DI): $212,207 total reported compensation
  • JOEL GOERING (DIR OF FINAN): $171,539 total reported compensation
  • MARK FALONI (LEAD TEACHER): $136,893 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Briya pcs is a public charter school and is operating under a contract with the dc government through the dc public charter school board, providing high quality education for adults and children that empowers families through a culturally sensitive family literacy model.

What it reported doing in 2024

Briya public charter school is a two-generation public charter school designed to give an integrated educational experience to immigrant parents and their children. Families enroll in briya's two-generation program together: parents study english, digital literacy, and parenting while their young children receive a high-quality early education. The program builds on families' strengths and provides tools and support for improving educational, economic, and social opportunities. Briya collaborates and co-locates with mary's center for maternal and child care, inc., a federally qualified health center that offers a variety of medical, dental, and social services. Briya is consistently recognized as a high-performing school in adult and early childhood education by the dc public charter school board. Briya offers the following programs: adult education - parents learn english, from basic to advanced levels, and gain practical digital literacy skills to help their families thrive. Early childhood education - infant, toddler, and prek classes for the children of adult students are held simultaneously with adult classes. Classes use a reggio emilia-inspired approach. Parenting and family time - briya's unique model brings parents and children together each week. After learning about child development theory during parenting class, adults see their knowledge come to life as they engage with their children in the infant, toddler, and prek classrooms. With early childhood teachers offering guidance as needed, parents gain confidence to extend and reinforce learning at home. Workforce development programs - two programs help students achieve economic independence with credentials for jobs in health care and early education: -medical assistant (ma) program: this 12-15-month program prepares students for a career as a registered medical assistant in medical offices, clinics and hospitals. Ma students learn to perform both clinical and administrative duties. -child development associate (cda) program: this 10-month program, offered in english and spanish, prepares students to gain the nationally recognized child development associate (cda) credential. With the cda credential, graduates can pursue career options such as early childhood teacher, home visitor, or operator of a licensed home daycare facility. The national external diploma program (nedp) - students in briya's highest-level english class have the opportunity to earn a high school diploma through the nedp, which is specifically designed to meet the needs of adult learners. Briya's student services department provides individualized support for comprehensive student needs, including medical care, mental health care, employment, immigration legal services, emergency shelter, continuing education, and more. On-site mental health therapist meets one-on-one with students and leads small support groups. Language interpretation is available to students in during registration, workshops, and referral services.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 88% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.4%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 87.4%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: $20.44 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.6%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.84; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.1%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.4% of revenue deployed · 87.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $14.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $212K · 18 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $474K reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 57/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.