Brittingham Viking Scholars Organization Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 473387713
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Madison, WI, USA
- Phone
- 8123223129
- Rating
- 46
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Academic Exchange
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,670
- Expenses
- $2,662
- Assets
- $338,044
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID BARRETT (PRESIDENT)
- MCCORMICK SINCLAIR (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DAVID BARRETT (PRESIDENT)
- MCCORMICK SINCLAIR (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ALYSSA BIRKELAND (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide scholarship opportunities between the university of Wisconsin-madison, and nordic universities in norway, sweden, denmark, and finland.
What it reported doing in 2024
Connected current and future scholarship recipients with communications and newsletter. Held scholarship selections to determine new scholars to go on to study abroad. Paid for and maintained website to distribute information about the organization to both prospective scholars, current scholars, and alumni of the organization.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 79% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 15
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 88
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 9.2%; rating input score 9
- Program expense ratio: 24.9%; rating input score 25
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 69.3%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 126.99; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -189.5% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 9.2% of revenue deployed · 24.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $662 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 9/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 25/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.