Bristol Bay Economic Development Corp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 920142567
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Dillingham, AK, USA
- Phone
- 9078424370
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $20,020,774
- Expenses
- $21,652,256
- Assets
- $394,959,006
- Liabilities
- $3,297,554
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL LINK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHAEL LINK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $330,050 total reported compensation
- STACI FIESER (CFO): $229,181 total reported compensation
- CHRISTOPHER NAPOLI (CAO): $180,069 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
It is the purpose of the bristol bay economic development corporation to promote economic growth and opportunities for residents of its member communities through sustainable use of the bering sea resources.
What it reported doing in 2023
Regional fishing development - see schedule obbedc offers vessel upgrade grants to resident commercial fishers to help upgrade and modernize the fleet with technical innovations, efficient engines, outboards, or simply the repairs necessary to keep vessels out on the fishing grounds. A new change was made to the program in 2023; previous participants in the vessel upgrade grant program may qualify for the program again, provided their application meets the eligibility criteria. Drift operations can qualify for up to $35,000 and set net operations for up to $17,500 to help optimize their fishing operations. In 2023, bbedc spent $1,008,252 to help fifty-six resident fishers from fifteen bristol bay communities upgrade their equipment.in-season emergency provisionthe in-season emergency provision provides emergency support for resident fishers needing to get back on the water if they experience a catastrophic engine or drive train failure during the season. Qualifying resident drift operations can access up to $35,000, and qualifying resident set net operations can access up to $17,500. Applicants who have received a vessel upgrade grant in the previous three years may not be eligible as these programs share the same pool of funding. In 2023, bbedc spent $64,284 through this provision to help five resident fishers continue their season after breaking down.rsw purchase programmany processors offer a substantial bonus for chilling, and delivering high quality chilled fish has become the industry standard in bristol bay. Refrigerated sea water (rsw) systems can provide an efficient alternative to icing while also saving on fuel expenses and reduced fishing time from travelling to get ice. Rsw systems cool sea water in the vessel's fish holds to chill the catch, keeping harvested salmon fresh. Bbedc's rsw purchase program offers grants of up to $22,000 to assist qualified bristol bay watershed resident fishers with the cost of purchasing an rsw system. To ensure efficient operation of an rsw unit, vessels must be prepared with insulated fish holds, adequate hydraulics, and proper plumbing before being approved for an rsw grant. Applications for the rsw purchase program are accepted year-round, and grant funds can be used in conjunction with bbedc's vessel upgrade grant to further reduce the fisher's cost of preparing their vessel for an rsw system. In 2023, bbedc distributed $44,000 across two rsw purchase program grants.rsw support programmany processors in bristol bay require their fleet to chill their harvest to ensure a consistently high-quality product. Refrigerated sea water (rsw) systems are invaluable to many fishers as they allow operators to focus on fishing without the need for pausing to chase ice, however these systems often require certified rsw technicians to assist with start-up and repairs. Bbedc offers qualifying resident fishers an annual grant of up to $1,000 to help alleviate the cost for technical assistance on pre-season start-ups, maintenance, and winterization of their rsw units. In 2023, nineteen resident fishers across seven communities received $14,223 in grant awards. Bristol bay ice, llc (bbice)bbedc's ice barge the bristol maid serviced the nushagak fleet near clarks point and sold 408,302 lbs. Of ice to fishers, a 37% decrease in sales from 2022. This decrease could be because there were significantly less boats registered in the district in 2023, and many captains ended their season early after processors announced a reduced price paid to fishers for their salmon. With the bristol lady out of commission this season, bbedc contracted with northline seafoods to ensure the fleet had access to ice on the eastside of bristol bay via the sm-3. Northline's sm-3 provided slurry ice in the naknek district, rather than the traditional flake ice. Overall, ice distribution efforts in the bay went smoothly in 2023, and bbedc looks forward to continuing its chilling operations and partnerships in the years to come.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 64% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 63% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 60
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 83.3%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 55%; rating input score 55; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.1%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 18.24; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.8%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 83.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 20 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $18M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $330K · 24 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $1.6M reported
- Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2013 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 70 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 61 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 55/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.