Bringing in the Sand Fund Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 260784350
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2009
- Location
- Hauppauge, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6316781372
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Urban, Community Economic Development
Reported finances
- Expenses
- $18,733
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN LUND (PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
- WILLIAM RUSSELL (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOHN LUND (PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
- WILLIAM RUSSELL (VICE PRESIDENT)
- DENNIS O'DOHERTY (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the corporation (a.k.a. As the bits fund, inc.) is to address short and long-term threats of erosion on 4,000 foot-long oceanfront of the davis park community of nearly 300 homes and their visitors on fire island, ny. Funds are raised for building beaches and dunes, preserving ecology, and providing reserve funds for future emergency work , accomplished alone or with other governmental agencies, as necessary. The concern is over global warming, raising oceans, and the corporation will focus on preventing dangerous sea-breeches that could severely flood the great south bay.
What it reported doing in 2020
The purpose of the corporation (a.k.a. As the bits fund, inc.) is to address short and long-term threats of erosion on 4,000 foot-long oceanfront of the davis park community of nearly 300 homes and their visitors on fire island, ny. Funds are raised for building beaches and dunes, preserving ecology, and providing reserve funds for future emergency work , accomplished alone or with other governmental agencies, as necessary.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 9
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -24.8% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -15.9% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 2 of 2 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.