Bring Hope
Legal name: BRING HOPE A NJ NonProfit
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 850974411
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2023
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Pompton Lakes, New Jersey, USA
- Phone
- (973) 858-8163
- Rating
- 47
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $88,365
- Expenses
- $42,158
- Assets
- $111,195
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Karl Roman (President)
People named in this filing
- Karl Roman (President)
- Anne Jimenez (Treasurer/Board Member)
- Zoryvette Perez (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to support and broaden the options available to those in the most vulnerable populations of the communities we serve. We will offer a new and restored hope to individuals, families, and communities through an array of supports, services, and education that promote wellbeing, self-sustainability, resiliency, and the preservation of family with respect for religion, culture, age, race, gender, disability, and sexuality.
What it reported doing in 2023
We now offer CPR Training Life Support Services as well have increased our cases in order to assist more individuals and families. We are branching out and opening two more offices in communities where help is needed.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 79
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 52.3%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.64; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 51.3% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 62% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2020 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.