Bring Bri Justice Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
300461285
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Mendacino, CA, USA
Phone
7758300830
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Safety Education

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,144
Expenses
$7,338
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRIDGETTE ZUNINO (President)
  • LAUREN DENISON (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • BRIDGETTE ZUNINO (President)
  • TERI BOLAND (Treasurer)
  • LAUREN DENISON (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To use all available resources to help our community and their families by raising awareness about violent crimes, personal safety, and ensuring justice is served.

What it reported doing in 2013

The current focus of the foundation is on the following:1. Dna legislation-assist in finding funding for the currently unfunded dna laws in Nevada.-aid in broadening the sampling of dna to include all felony arrests.-assist in funding backlog of samples already taken in the state of Nevada.-change and broaden dna legislation nationally in order to create a consistent database, aiding law enforcement.2. Brianna guides - kits designed to aid those with missing loved ones including directions for setting up a recovery center, media guides, and law enforcement communication.3. Community personal safety - includes safety awareness kits, community safety events, university campus escort services.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 71% for direct work, and 29% for member benefits.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 9
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -242.3%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -37.5% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -89.3% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.