Bright Star Schools

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
550806673
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Los Angeles, CA, US
Phone
(323) 954-9957
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Charter Schools

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$116,901,212
Expenses
$82,232,041
Assets
$254,257,979
Liabilities
$147,679,389

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANA L MARTINEZ (PRESIDENT/CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANA L MARTINEZ (PRESIDENT/CEO): $332,996 total reported compensation
  • ELIJAH SUGAY (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $199,718 total reported compensation
  • ZEBIB HABTE (HEAD OF ACCOUNTING SERV. (THRU 6/25)): $185,494 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Bright Star Schools is a free, public, open enrollment charter school organization that operates nine schools across Los Angeles. Founded in 2003, we provide 3,700+ students in grades TK - 12 with holistic, inclusive support to and through college.

What it reported doing in 2024

Bright star schools operated nine public charter schools serving approximately 3,600 students across los angeles county through a tk-12 college-preparatory educational model focused on academic achievement, college readiness, and whole-child development. The organization's schools primarily served historically underserved communities in west adams/south los angeles, koreatown, and the northeast san fernando valley. Bright star schools maintained a comprehensive college-going culture designed to prepare students for success in higher education, career pathways, and civic life. Program services included standards-based academic instruction, college counseling, advanced placement coursework, alumni support services, family engagement programming, after-school enrichment, social-emotional support, and community school partnerships. During the reporting period, the organization maintained a student-to-counselor ratio of approximately 130:1, significantly below the California average, to provide individualized college and academic advising. The organization achieved a 95% high school graduation rate, with one high school achieving a 100% graduation rate, and an estimated 88% college matriculation rate among graduating seniors. Bright star schools' high schools were recognized nationally by u.s. News & world report, with rankings placing the schools among the top public high schools nationwide. Additionally, multiple schools received college board ap school honor roll recognition for expanding student access to advanced placement coursework and supporting college readiness outcomes. As part of its community schools model, bright star schools partnered with more than 50 community organizations to provide wraparound services supporting student and family well-being. Services included free health screenings, eye exams and eyeglasses, mental health supports, food and resource distribution, family workshops, community advisory councils, and school-based engagement programming. During the reporting period, students and families received over 200 pairs of free eyeglasses, along with donated school supplies, backpacks, shoes, toys, and technology resources. Bright star schools also continued operating a six-year alumni support and college success program to assist graduates with college persistence, financial aid renewal, academic advising, and career planning. The long-term objective of these services is to increase college completion rates, expand economic opportunity, strengthen community stability, and prepare students to become future leaders within the communities served.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 97% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Liabilities are high compared with assets and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 61
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 76
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 59.8%; rating input score 60
  • Program expense ratio: 84.3%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 29.7%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.09; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.58; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 15.5% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 20.6% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 59.8% of revenue deployed · 84.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $69.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $333K · 20 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.2M reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.