Bridging The Horizon

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
474063100
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2017
Location
Salem, NH, USA
Phone
6034015907
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$174,819
Expenses
$155,378
Assets
$103,620

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Patricia Earle (President)
  • David Habib (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Patricia Earle (President)
  • David Habib (Vice President)
  • Andrea O'Brien (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide social and recreational events for individuals with special needs.

What it reported doing in 2025

Our mission is to foster a warm and inclusive community where adults with disabilities feel valued and supported. We provide affordable enrichment and entertainment activities that empower growth and expand their horizons. We promote inclusion and breaking down barriers to participation for those with different abilites.All of our activities are open to all special needs individuals and their families. Our events and services include themed dances complete with dinner, desserts, gift bags, DJ, raffles, door prizes and decorations. We offer 3 weeks of summer camp with a wide variety of activities, an annual gala event and a Makerspace Studio with a wide variety of woodworking tools, 3D printers and various other craft opportunities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 37
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 35.3%; rating input score 35
  • Program expense ratio: 39.8%; rating input score 40

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.1%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.67; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 21.4% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 31.3% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 23.5% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 35.3% of revenue deployed · 39.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $62K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 35/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 40/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.