Bridgeway Recovery Services Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
263634042
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2020
Location
Salem, OR, USA
Phone
5033632021
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alcohol, Drug and Substance Abuse, Dependency Prevention and Treatment

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$22,704,585
Expenses
$18,294,313
Assets
$47,029,527
Liabilities
$3,090,725

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TIMOTHY MURPHY (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
  • CARLOS O TEXIDOR MALDONADO (CEO (BEG. JAN.'25))

Highest reported compensation

  • TIMOTHY MURPHY (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $314,963 total reported compensation
  • RENEE HANCOCK (CHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICER): $168,873 total reported compensation
  • SARAH HADFIELD (PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT): $161,652 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Bridgeway recovery services is a social service agency providing a continuum of addictions and mental health services and support to individuals and their families.

What it reported doing in 2024

Corrections programs - bridgeway's corrections programs are certified by the Oregon health authority, and provide rehabilitation services for those struggling with drug and alcohol problems, mental health symptoms, and criminal behavior that has led to justice system involvement. As a support for marion county mental health court, bridgeway collaborates closely with the marion county sheriff's office to facilitate communication with state of Oregon department of human services workers, probation officers, and employers about clients' needs, challenges, and progress. Continued on schedule oalong with the services of bridgeway's counseling and medical staff, individuals receive personal support from certified drug and mental health recovery mentors who also are experiencing a life free from addiction. Their mission is to ease client's transition and support their recovery by helping to facilitate safe living environments, employment opportunities, and social connections.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 73% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 78
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 68.6%; rating input score 69
  • Program expense ratio: 88.8%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 91.8%; rating input score 92; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 19.4%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.57; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 16.6% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 32% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 68.6% of revenue deployed · 88.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $16.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $315K · 13 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.9M reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Whistleblower policy not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.