Bridges Public Charter School
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 731681983
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2025450515
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Charter Schools
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $17,058,224
- Expenses
- $13,653,959
- Assets
- $26,422,255
- Liabilities
- $3,083,418
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- OLIVIA SMITH (PRESIDENT &)
Highest reported compensation
- OLIVIA SMITH (PRESIDENT &): $235,552 total reported compensation
- GEORGIA VERGOS (COO): $164,025 total reported compensation
- DANETTE DICKS (ASSISTANT PR): $141,358 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to provide an exemplary, individualized early childhood and elementary educational program that includes students with special needs. Our developmentally appropriate, student and family-centered educational approach nurtures students to expand their developmental skills, in order to build a foundation for lifelong learning.
What it reported doing in 2024
Bridges public charter school (the "charter school") was established to provide preschool education to students with and without special needs in the district of columbia. The charter school was incorporated under the laws of the district of columbia in august 2003. The school was granted a 15-year charter to operate as a public charter school in the district of columbia under the dc public school reform act of 1995. The school program opened in august of 2005. In march 2012, the charter school was granted approval by the dc public charter school board to expand into an elementary school program, to serve grades pre-k through fifth. The charter school reached grade level capacity in the 2017-2018 school year with fifth grade. During november 2015, the charter school's legal name was changed from bridges charter school to bridges public charter school. Bridges' charter was renewed by the dc public charter school board for an additional 15 years on november 18, 2019, to operate as a public charter school in the district of columbia under the dc public school reform act of 1995. Bridges public charter school is unique in the dc education landscape serving a higher percentage of students with special needs in one school building than all but one other charter school in dc (st. Coletta). Bridges provides a continuum of inclusive learning environments and high-level special education classrooms. The school student population is 38% students with special needs, 52% english language learners, and 65% students who qualify for free or reduced lunch (low-income). The charter school's activities are funded primarily by the district of columbia's per pupil allocation formula, supplemented with federal funds allocated to the state education agency to be distributed to schools for staff development, special education services, and other eligible expenses.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 69.5%; rating input score 69
- Program expense ratio: 88%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $75.64 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 20%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.94; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.8%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.5% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 69.5% of revenue deployed · 88% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $12M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $236K · 16 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $1.1M reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.