Bridges Preparatory School Pto Attn Kimberly Gardner
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 463778313
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Beaufort, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8439827737
- Rating
- 40
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $55,622
- Expenses
- $51,458
- Assets
- $36,787
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TAYLOR HUNT (President)
- STEPHANIE WALKER (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- KIMBERLY GARDNER (Treasurer)
- MIA MUSIC (Volunteer Coord)
- TAYLOR HUNT (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of bridges preparatory school parent teacher organization ("bps pto") is to enhance and support the mission of bridges preparatory school ("bps"), develop a closer connection between bps and home by encouraging parental involvement, and to improve the learning environment through financial support, volunteerism, and open communication.
What it reported doing in 2023
During the 2023-24 fiscal year bridges preparatory pto raised monies to provide funding for the purchase of new outdoor shade structures for the school campus, hosted teacher & staff appreciation events, provided meals for faculty, staff & students on selected occasions, and provided support for various grade-level events.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 4
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 3.6%; rating input score 4
- Program expense ratio: 3.8%; rating input score 4
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.5%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.71; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -23.3% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.8% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 3.6% of revenue deployed · 3.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2015 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 4/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 4/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.