BRIDGES for a Just Community
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 651256502
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2010
- Forms available
- Form 990 2010
- Location
- Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Phone
- 5133814660
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Private Operating Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,088,513
- Expenses
- $1,191,621
- Assets
- $151,880
- Liabilities
- $354,281
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
43 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Bringing people together to achieve inclusion, equity and justice for all.
What it reported doing in 2010
Just Community Youth Leadership Institute - provides young leaders a residential experience, continuous learning programs, a support network and resources for leading change efforts. During the year work was done in 17 high schools.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 12
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.5%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.13; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.33; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.9%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -29.7% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -24.6% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 40 of 40 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $711K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $94K · 43 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2009 to 2010
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.