Bridgelight Arts Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 464943758
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6469064743
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Performing Arts Organizations
Reported finances
- Expenses
- $18
- Assets
- $39
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DARIN ADAMS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DARIN ADAMS (PRESIDENT)
- BYRREN YATES (TREASURER)
- KEITH VENO (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Joemoe: (noun) any moment in which one's soul connects with another or with the divine in such a way that one's purpose becomes clear. It's a moment in which time ceases to define the scope of one's potential impact in the world or the good one dreams to do. Joseph "joe-bear" adams spent only 15 months of life on this earth, all with tremendous challenges to his body and mind.joemoe arts is a New York city based non-profit company (formerly bridgelight arts) founded by joe's parents and siblings, dedicated to inspiring and creating joemoes in as many lives as possible through the language of the arts. Joemoe arts tells stories through theater, music, film, dance and other media, designed to inspire hope, meaning and purpose, and to connect souls to one another and to the divine.
What it reported doing in 2024
Education - offer classes, workshops, and lessons to artists and churches.productions - develop and produce original works, musicals, songs and other faith-inspired works.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.17; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -20.4% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.