Bridgadier General Donald B Wagner USA Msc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742283644
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- San Antonio, TX, USA
- Phone
- 5712088866
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Higher Education Institutions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $17,931
- Expenses
- $23,817
- Assets
- $404,916
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Steve Meigs (Board President)
- Frank Cumberland (Board Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Steve Meigs (Board President)
- Frank Cumberland (Board Vice President)
- Patricia Lewis (Board Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Philanthropic Award Scholarships
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization's activities include awarding scholarship grants to children and grandchildren of Air Force Medical Service Corps officers -- active duty, reserve, guard, retired -- in accordance with the corporation charter and bylaws. In 2025, the organization awarded twelve (12) scholarships in the aggregate amount of $22,000. Please see comment for line 10 as well as Schedule O for details. The organization's operating expenses in 2025 included -- administrative (USPO Box), development of our new website by a paid contractor, and website operations. The corporation is managed by volunteer board members.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 92% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -32.8%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 17; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -25% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $24K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.