Bridal Association of Brazos Valley
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742645450
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2014
- Location
- Bryan, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9795711465
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Business and Industry
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $86,664
- Expenses
- $109,232
- Assets
- $59,363
- Liabilities
- $315
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TRAVIS ROLLINS (PRESIDENT)
- LARRY WINKLER (FIRST VICE PRESIDENT)
- TIM J HARRIS (PAST PRESIDENT)
- LEAH SMITH (MEMBERSHIP VICE PRESIDENT)
- THOMAS ROSS (MARKETING VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TRAVIS ROLLINS (PRESIDENT)
- LARRY WINKLER (FIRST VICE PRESIDENT)
- TIM J HARRIS (PAST PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To educate the general public and coordinate the efforts of the brazos valley area businesses in the planning of weddings, bridal arrangements and services. It includes, but is not limited to, an annual show and banquet. The bridal show is held as a benefit to area charities.
What it reported doing in 2014
To educate the general public and coordinate the efforts of the brazos valley area businesses in the planning of weddings, bridal arrangements and services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 82% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 81% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 94
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 83.3%; rating input score 83
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -26%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.54; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.8% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 83.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $91K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.