Brian M Anselmo Memorial Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 263698163
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2008
- Location
- Kansas City, MO, USA
- Phone
- 8168031842
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $272,467
- Expenses
- $329,079
- Assets
- $58,116
- Liabilities
- $46,715
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- JULIE SANO (EXECUTIVE DI): $72,899 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Knowing that brian believed in the jesuit tradition of being "a man for others," it is our aim to positively touch the lives of others through charitable giving, promoting educational opportunities and promoting animal welfare in his name.
What it reported doing in 2024
Other program services include: - teamsmile (18,302) - kids tlc (17,422) - midwest animal rescue (10,440) - charlie's house (8,844) - temple made foundation (8,000) - live like luke foundation (3,000) - our lady of presentation (2,500) - rockhurst high school (2,177) - the plaza academy (2,150) - safehome (2,140) - andrew olson foundation (2,000) - operation breakthrough (1,900) - resurrection school (1,545) - journey to new life (1,531) - hope house (1,150) - interurban arthaus (1,059) - lucky dog rescue (1,000) - warriors best friend foundation (1,000) - shadow buddies (995) - miracle of innocence (993) - st. Michael the archangel (594) - project mexico (546) - our lady of unity catholic school (515) - martin city melodrama & vaudeville co (500) - stephen siller foundation (230) - Kansas city rescue mission (213) - paypal giving fund (103) - other misc grants and under 100 (90)
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 63
- Sustainability: 12
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 73.1%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 60.4%; rating input score 60
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.82 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 86%; rating input score 86; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -20.8%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.8; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 22.2%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 73.1% of revenue deployed · 60.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $199K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $73K · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 8 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.