Bretton Woods Adaptive Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 510610547
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2011
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2011, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Bretton Woods, NH, USA
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Forest Conservation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $30,083
- Expenses
- $56,113
- Assets
- $43,131
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Bretton woods adaptive, inc., is a non-profit 501(c)3 organization whose mission is to provide instruction to enable persons with physical or developmental challenges to participate in recreational sports. Bretton woods adaptive strives to foster independence and to maximize abilities so that each participant reaches his/her potential as an athlete in their chosen sport. Bwas&r is able to accommodate people with a various disabilities including, but not limited to, spinal cord injury, post polio, amputation, down's syndrome, tbi, ptsd, autism, multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, and hearing or visual impairment. We use a variety of techniques and equipment to meet the diverse needs of adaptive sports enthusiasts.
What it reported doing in 2011
We logged 241 2 hour lessons...six local schools...and ages from 3 to 78 years of age. We were down a bit from the year before due to the serious lack of snow.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 74.7%; rating input score 75
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -86.5%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.77; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 74.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $42K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $25K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.