Brentwood Park Initiative
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 800437247
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4126410008
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $14,156
- Expenses
- $697
- Assets
- $35,033
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PATRICIA HEIN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- PATRICIA HEIN (PRESIDENT)
- FRANCIS CAPPETTA (TREASURER)
- JULIE MCCARTHY (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The brentwood park initiative was organized to support the borough of brentwood and the brentwood school district, which are public organizations situated in allegheny county, pa. The borough of brentwood has encountered increasing budgetary constraints as the demand for government services increases while the public tax base remains stagnant or even declines. In recent years, the borough has been unable to devote sufficient funds to properly maintain and imporove it's parks and recreational facilities, including the stadium utilized by the brentwood school district. Traditionally, the stadium has served as the main venue for the school district's athletic and recreational events. Due to inadequate funding, the school district has been unable to conduct home track meets in the stadium, the grass field and stadium seats need to be refurbished, and the stadium is in need of significant upgrade in order to be comparable to the facilities of other school districts. Similarly, the brentwood
What it reported doing in 2018
To ensure brentwood park is sustainably protected, restored, enhanced, and developed for the educational recreational, and wellness of brentwood residents and visitors.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 95% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 30
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 3.5%; rating input score 4
- Program expense ratio: 71.7%; rating input score 72
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 95.1%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 50.26; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -64.1% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -31% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -28% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 3.5% of revenue deployed · 71.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $500 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2011 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.