Brentwood Lacrosse Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 621872819
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Brentwood, TN, USA
- Phone
- 6156498027
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Camps
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $105,674
- Expenses
- $94,546
- Assets
- $37,276
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MERIDITH WINGFIELD (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MERIDITH WINGFIELD (PRESIDENT)
- TIM HARLAN (VICE PRESIDE)
- ASHLEY CALISE (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Brentwood lacrosse club aspires to be an outstanding educational-athletic organization that provides a high-quality experience to every athlete. Athletes from 3rd grade to 12th grade train and compete in a high quality and competitive lacrosse program that participates in tournaments and leagues, which innately teaches the players leadership, teamwork, and discipline. The players improve skills, tactics, and strategies of the game. Our coaches teach life lessons that have value beyond the playing field.
What it reported doing in 2024
Chartered in 2003, brentwood lacrosse club (blc) is the oldest lacrosse club in the state of Tennessee. We support more than 150 players in grades 3 through 12 in the brentwood, Tennessee area. The boys lacrosse program provided quality lacrosse training for athletes and competed in competitive tournaments that helped athletes improve their skills and reach their goals.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 77% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 93
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.5%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.5%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.39; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -13% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $95K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.