Brenntag Solidarity Fund
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 882727549
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Reading, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4847935363
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Corporate Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $54,887
- Expenses
- $34,578
- Assets
- $156,737
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANDREA MULLER (DIRECTOR, PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ANDREA MULLER (DIRECTOR, PRESIDENT)
- ROBERT MOSER (DIRECTOR)
- SUSAN ELLINGTON (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The brenntag solidarity fund (the fund) is organized and operated to provide timely financial assistance to current and former employees of brenntag north america, inc. And its subsidiaries and members of their families who are impacted by a national emergency, disaster, or other emergency hardship situations and thereby experience financially devastating circumstances beyond their control and means, with recipients being selected based on an objective determination of need.
What it reported doing in 2025
Provide access to and distributing information regarding financial and other forms of assistance available to brenntag north america, inc. And its subsidiaries employees, former employees, and their families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 80% for direct work, and 20% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 48
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 78
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 41.9%; rating input score 42
- Program expense ratio: 57.5%; rating input score 57
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 37%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.53; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 81% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -41.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 41.9% of revenue deployed · 57.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $20K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.