Breath of CHRIST Ministries Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
208246224
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Branson, MO, USA
Phone
9139407116
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Professional Societies & Associations
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$59,794
Expenses
$50,050
Assets
$35,728
Liabilities
$29,848

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Lucy Della valle (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Lucy Della valle (CEO)
  • Nicholas Della Valle (CFO)
  • Martin Finkelstein (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The general purpose of this corporation is to introduce non-Christians to Jesus Christ (evangelism) and to encourage Christians to use their gifts and abilities for their families and community, living in a manner that will advance the gospel of Jesus Christ and draw people to understand and consider the Christian faith.This is accomplished through speaking engagements, the presentation of Biblical drama through all arenas of media transmission and by personal invitation, as well as preparations and execution of the 3300 Mile Walk for Awareness.

What it reported doing in 2020

Over 61 presentations in churches across the nation of the Biblical character dramas about Bartimeaus, Zaccheus, Innkeeper, and the Boy the loaves and the Fish. Occasionally the ministry does presentations at schools.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.3%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.71; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.84; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 62.9%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.9% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2011 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.