Bread for the World

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
510175510
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2026399400
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Development
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$8,438,465
Expenses
$7,063,536
Assets
$22,426,638
Liabilities
$6,773,404

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

42 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Eugene Cho (President/CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • Eugene Cho (President/CEO): $403,333 total reported compensation
  • Heather Taylor (Managing Director): $256,075 total reported compensation
  • Edward Kaufholz (Director): $193,445 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Bread for the World is a Christian advocacy organization urging U.S. decision makers to do all they can to pursue a world without hunger. Our mission is to educate and equip people to advocate for policies and programs that can help end hunger in the U.S. and around the world. Read More ;) Food banks are also essential – but we focus on advocacy. Why? Because federal nutrition programs provide roughly 10 times as much food assistance as private churches and charities combined. With the stroke of a pen, our government leaders have the power to create policies and programs that impact millions of people at once.

What it reported doing in 2025

Public Policy: Solving a complex problem such as hunger requires a clear understanding of the impact of specific policies and how policies affect each other. Bread's Policy and Research Institute's (PRI) nonpartisan analysis and identification of action steps help strengthen Bread as a trusted voice. (To be continued in Schedule O)Public Policy: The Institute contributed to research and thought leadership through briefings, coalition meetings, webinars, blogs, and policy papers on a variety of hunger-related policy and programs that came through Congress. Here are a few highlights from 2025: In September, Bread published its Nourish Our Future Policy Roadmap, a comprehensive framework focused on ending child hunger in the United States and around the world. The roadmap outlines practical, evidence-based policy solutions to ensure all children have consistent access to nutritious food, with particular emphasis on strengthening federal nutrition programs, improving maternal and child health, and addressing the root causes of food insecurity. Grounded in research and informed by the lived experiences of families, it has served as a unifying guide for Bread's advocacy, helping to align partners and equip policymakers with a clear, actionable path to ensure every child can thrive.In April, the Institute hosted its inaugural Climate and Nutrition Symposium to learn about and identify solutions to hunger and climate challenges in the U.S. and abroad. Featuring expert panelists with backgrounds in agricultural research, rural development, humanitarian response, and foreign aid policy, the 3-day Symposium brought together nearly 100 participants from the humanitarian, research, hunger response, and private sector to learn about how more effective food systems, better climate finance, and strategic climate mobility policies can help end hunger during a climate crisis. The final day of the Symposium culminated in bringing attendees to congressional offices to provide education on how climate is a hunger issue.In November, Bread brought together faith leaders, advocates, policy experts, and community members gathered in Frankfort, KY for a daylong conference focused on addressing hunger and strengthening our shared commitment to ending food insecurity. The event highlighted both the challenges and opportunities facing Kentucky families, especially in light of the ongoing government shutdown and cuts to federal nutrition programs. Throughout the day, participants engaged in thoughtful workshops and discussions, built relationships, and identified concrete actions to ensure every Kentuckian has access to nutritious food.A delegation from Bread participated in the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP30), where they hosted three events highlighting how well-designed school meal programs can stabilize local food systems, support smallholder farmers, and improve long-term child health. In addition to our Bread-organized panels, we co-hosted a side event titled "Faith-based Partnership Advancing the Paris Agreement in the United States with Global Solidarity." This gathering emphasized how faith-based organizations are advancing climate priorities at both local and international levels. Bread also convened a listening session with grassroots leaders to inform our climate priorities and future scope of work. These conversations reinforced the importance of ensuring that climate-smart food policies reflect the lived realities of communities most affected by climate disruption.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 83
  • Accountability: 98
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.9%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 87.7%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: $16.34 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 97.2%; rating input score 97; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.3%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.17; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.3; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14.1%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
  • Where the money goes: 82.9% of revenue deployed · 87.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 35 of 36 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $6.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $403K · 42 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 40 of 40 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 53/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.