Brazelton Touchpoints Project Inc C/o Brazelton Touchpoints Ctr
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 043327682
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Boston, MA, USA
- Phone
- 6177016294
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Behavioral Science
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,515,980
- Expenses
- $1,510,797
- Assets
- $11,281,426
- Liabilities
- $692,884
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOSHUA SPARROW (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JOSHUA SPARROW (PRESIDENT): $14,725 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Brazelton touchpoints project, inc. (btp) was created to encourage, develop, fund and administer programs and research that focus on the training of multi-disciplinary family services professionals and others to create alliances with parents and other caregivers based upon the process of development of young children. Btp supports the brazelton touchpoints center at boston children's hospital.
What it reported doing in 2024
Brazelton touchpoints project, inc., (btp) supports the work of the brazelton touchpoints center (btc). Btc collaborates with providers, organizations, institutions, systems of care, and communities who understand that to improve outcomes for children, they must engage more effectively with families. To reach as many families and other caregivers as possible, we work through providers who have a unique opportunity to influence families during children's formative years. Btc provides professional and leadership development, organizational learning and change, and research and evaluation for family-facing professionals in pediatrics, early childhood education, child care, infant mental health, children's libraries and museums, home visiting, and child welfare. It is home to the touchpoints approach, the brazelton institute (which developed and trains on the newborn behavioral observation and the neonatal behavioral assessment scale), family connections, and the btc research and evaluation team. The vision of btc is a world in which every child experiences love, joy, and wonder and grows up to be an adult who can strengthen our communities' capacity for self-determination, cope with adversity, steward our planet's fragile resources, and experience the joy of nurturing the next generation to do the same. Every child is all our children.among other outcomes, the work of btc has had a demonstrated impact on: -measurable development outcomes (e.g., social-emotional and cognitive development) -strengthened parent-child bond leading to higher scores on measures of attachment (which are linked to later learning and educational performance) -reduced levels of parent/caregiver stress -increased parenting competence and confidence -increased parent/caregiver literacy activities with children -increased timely follow through on referrals for preventive health -improved quality of early education programs -improved collaboration and coordination of services across disciplines and organizations -sustained organization-wide changessince 1996, btc's work has reached more than 1.5 million families, 50,000 providers, 1,000 community-based touchpoints trainers, 50 states and the district of columbia, 20 tribal communities, and five continents. Btp grants are made to support the general operating expenses of the brazelton touchpoints center and the center's work in specific geographic locations or with specific populations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 58% for direct work, and 42% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 92
- Sustainability: 85
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 62%; rating input score 62
- Program expense ratio: 90.4%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $25.39 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 40%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.47; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 62% of revenue deployed · 90.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 16 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $15K · 17 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $159K reported
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.